Ganapuram Laxman v. Sandapuram Tarun

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRL.P.MP.Nos. 13904 & 13905 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.12536 OF 2017 ORDER:

CRL.P.MP.Nos. 13904 & 13905 OF 2017 These miscellaneous petitions are filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compromise and compound the offences to quash the proceedings in Crime No.40 of 2017 on the file of Station House Officer, Dhanwada Police Station, Mahaboobnagar District, for the offences punishable under Sections 324 & 504 IPC.

The petitioner/Accused and the first respondent/defacto complainant are present and they are identified by their respective counsels and produced Photostat copies of Aadhar cards to prove their identity.

A joint memo of compromise is filed by both the parties, when terms of joint memo of compromise are explained in Telugu language, they are admitted to be true and correct. Further, it is now submitted that, both, the petitioner/Accused and the first respondent/defacto complainant voluntarily entered into compromise due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they wanted to lead peaceful life.

Therefore, I find that the compromise is voluntary in the interest of both parties and permission is granted to compound the offence. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint memo

MSM,J CrlP_12536_2017 filed along with these petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are ordered.

Crl.P.NO.12536 OF 2017 In view of the orders passed by this Court in CRL.P.MP.Nos.13904 & 13905 OF 2017, this criminal petition is allowed.

Registry is directed to annex a copy of joint memo filed by both the parties, to this order.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date:18.12.2017 SP