T.Satyanarayana v. State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION Nos.45949 and 46007 of 2018 COMMON ORDER :

Since the issue raised in these writ petitions is one and the same, they are heard together and being disposed of by way of a common order.

The petitioners in these writ petitions are all working as NMR workers for the last more than two decades and they are aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not regularising their services in the said category in terms of the judgment dated 11.10.2018 rendered by this Court in W.P.No.36805 of 2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the judgment dated 11.10.2018 rendered by this Court in W.P.No.36805 of 2018 and contends that appropriate orders be passed in these writ petitions directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners in these writ petitions for regularisation of their services as NMRs in terms of the judgment dated 11.10.2018 rendered by this Court in W.P.No.36805 of 2018 and also in terms of the judgment

rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SECY., STATE OF KARNATAKA v. UMADEVI1.

The learned Government Pleader for Services appearing for the respondents has not disputed about the applicability of judgment dated 11.10.2018 rendered by this Court in W.P.No.36805 of 2018 and contends that similar orders be passed in these writ petitions also.

This Court, having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, is of the considered view that since all the petitioners are working with the respondents as NMRs for the last more than two decades and they are fully eligible and qualified for regularization of their services, these writ petitions can be disposed of directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for regularisation of their services as NMRs strictly in terms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in UMADEVI's case (supra) and also the judgment dated 11.10.2018 rendered by this Court in W.P.No.36805 of 2018. It is made clear that the whole exercise shall be completed within a reasonable period, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

1 (2006) 4 SCC 1

With the above observations, these writ petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in these writ petitions shall stand closed.

______________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI 27.02.2019.

Msr

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION Nos.45949 and 46007 of 2018 27.02.2019 Msr