Madanu Antony v. The Andhra Bank,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE T. AMARNATH GOUD W RI T PETI TI ON No.4 6 3 9 0 of 2 0 1 8 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) There was no representation for the petitioner when this matter was taken up for hearing on 20.08.2019. The matter was accordingly directed to be listed for dismissal.

2.

Today, the matter appears under the caption 'For Dismissal', but yet again, there is no representation for the petitioner or his learned counsel.

3.

Mr.

V.

Murli Manohar, learned counsel, representing Mrs. V. Dyumani, learned counsel for the Andhra Bank, respondent herein, informs this Court that the petitioner did not even comply with the conditional order dated 28.01.2019 passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order dated 28.01.2019 shall stand vacated.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SANJAY KUMAR, J ___________________ T. AMARNATH GOUD, J August 22, 2019 DSK