← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/13661/2018dismissed as infructuous

Ch. Tejaswi v. The State Of Telangana

2023-04-17Chillakur Sumalatha3 pages

[ 320e ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13661 OF 2018 Between:

Ch. Tejaswi, D/o Ch. Hari Charan Das, Aged about 22 years, R/o H.No.Flat No.402, 4'Floor, Plot No.B9, Nageshwar Rao Residency, Jawaher Nagar Colony, Moula AIi, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature' Hyderabad'

.....Respondenu Respondent

2. Smt Ch. Salomi, Wo Ch. Jagieeth, Aged about 24 years, R/o H.No.5-8660/l/8/lCLS, Building Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Opp-Dist. Collector Office, Hvderabad ...REspoNDENT/DEFAcro ..M,LATNANT Petition uhder Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 79 of 2018 of WPS, ,DD, Hyderabad l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all and further proceedings in Crime No. 79 of 2O18 of WPS, DD, Hyderabad, including arrest of the petitioner or Accused No.

3, Pending disposal of the Criminal petition This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G.SAI NARAYANA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the. Additional Public Pr6secutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.'l and Sri Praveen Vyapari, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13661 of 2018

ORDER

1.

The present Crimina-l Petition is filed see king the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.79 of 2018 of Women Police Station DD, Hyderabad.

2.

No representation on petitioner's side on call 3.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that on completion of investigation, charge sheet is laid and thus, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous 4.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives.

5.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed Sdi-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REqISTRAR Rik,'* SECTION OFFICER To i/TRUE COPY// '1 . The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, (DD), Hyderabad.

3. One CC to Sri Sai Narayana Rao, Advocate IOPUC]

4. One CC to Sri Praveen Vyapari, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

6. Two CD Copies Kj t\

\ HIGH COURT DAfED:171O412O23 1HE STr, 14 ,?- or.

l) Jiiil 20n

ORDER

CRLP.No.13661 ol 2018 \i-- THE CRL.P. IS DISMISSED.