Narsingoju Ratnakar v. The State Of Telangana,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 41552 OF 2017 Between:

Narsingoju Ratnakar, S/o. Brahmanandam, aged about 42 years, Rl/o. It4.G.Road, Kagaznagar. Adilabad District.

...PETITIONER AND 'i . The State of Telangana,, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

2. TFe District Collector, Asifabad, Komaram Bheem Asifabad District

3. The District Agricultural Officer, Asifabad, Komaram Bheem Asifabad District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus: i) declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not releasing the Tractor No.20 PTO HP to the petitioner, which was sanctioned to him under FM (NSP) Scheme, as illegal and arbitrary ii) consequently direct the 3rd respondent to release the Tractor No.20 pTO Hp to ihe petitioner ani reimburse the interest amount of Rs.35,57'1l-, which is being charged by the bank authorities.

WPMP. NO: 51533 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to handover the Tractor No.20 PTO HP to the petitioner by issuing necessary instructions to the Distributors i.e. M/s. Sri Venakt Sai Enterprisers Pvt. Ltd., & Ivl/s. Gajanan Enterprises, pending disposal of the writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K. VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD Writ Petition No.41552 of 2OL7 ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the interim orders granted earlier, no further orders need be passed in this writ Petition.

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this Writ Petition shall also stand dismissedSD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGIST R //TRUE COPY// SECTION FFICER l To '1. One CC to Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy' Advocate [OPUC]

2. iil CCs to GP for Agriculture, Hi'gh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies

4. One Spare CoPY SM *-

HIGH COURT DATED:28/06/2021 1$E 5T4r 1<

ORDER

J .J a 0 s JUL?0el o .L WP.No.4'1552 ol 2017 \(;

:t<rl S ir..r',1'- DISMISSING THE WP, AS INFRUCTUOUS, WTTHOUT COSTS.

t