Syed Riyaz Ahmed v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11550 OF 2017 ORDER:

Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017 This miscellaneous petition is filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compromise and compound the offences to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.503 of 2016, for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A & 406 IPC & Sections 4 & 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners nos.2 & 3/A-2 & A-3 and the second respondent/ defacto complainant are present and they are identified by their respective counsel and produced Photostat copies of Aadhar cards to prove their identity. Petitioner nos. 1 & 4 /A-1 & A-4 are not present, but they are represented by the second petitioner/A-2 by Special Power of Attorney.

A joint memo of compromise is filed by both the parties, when terms of compromise are explained in Urdu language by Learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana, they are admitted to be true and correct. Further, it is now submitted that, both the petitioners/A-1 to A-4 and the second respondent/defacto complainant voluntarily entered into compromise due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they wanted to lead peaceful life.

Therefore, I find that the compromise is voluntary in the interest of both parties and permission is granted to compound the

MSM,J CrlP_11550_2017 offence. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint memo of compromise filed along with this petition. Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

Crl.P.NO.11550 OF 2017 In view of the orders passed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.12805 OF 2017, this criminal petition is allowed. Registry is directed to annex a copy of joint memo of compromise filed by both the parties, to this order. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date:29.12.2017 SP