← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/62/2019dismissed as infructuous

Mudra Krishna v. Smt.Mudra Sangeetha

2023-12-06M.G.Priyadarsini3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 62 OF 2019 Petition Under Nlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order date 05-1 1-2018 in lA.No.11 of 2018 in OP.No.38 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad.

Between:

Mudra Krishna, S/o. Ananth Ramaiah, Aged about 36 years, R:/o. 929, Vasanth Nagar, K.P.H-B. Colony, Hyderabad.

.....Petitioner/Respondent AND Smt- Mudra Sangeetha, Wo. Krishna, Aged about 33 years, R/o. LK Faram Village of Navipet Mandal, Nizamabad District. ...RespondenUpetitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. D. PURNACHANDRA REDDY, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Sri. VANAM VISHWANATHAM, Advocate The Court made the following: OROER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSINI CTVIL REVISION PETITION No. 62 OF 2019 ORDER:

This revision has been hled against the orders passed in the interlocutory application pending the O.P. Now, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the main O.P. itself has been disposed and therefore, the cause in the revision has become infructuous.

Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

Sd/. G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR i //TRUE COPY// i I I SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad One CC to Sri. D. PURNACHANDRA REDDY, Advocate [OpUC] One CC to Sri. VANAM VTSHWANATHAM, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies PSR g

I I HIGH COURT DATED:0611212023

ORDER

CRP.No.62 of 2019 14:

l4 ( lt fl ?

o o (..

T s c DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

GJ{'

o >v p