G Raghunandan Kumar v. State Of Ap
[ 3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO:44652 oF 2017 Between:
G Raghunandan Kumar, s/o Sathyanarayana, Age 58 yrs, Occ Deputy tvlanager, Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Heacl Office, Hyderabad Disirict ...PETITIONER AND 1.
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of lndustries and Commerce, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Rep.by Managing Director, 5-9-'194, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad-01 The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Telangana Area, Rep.by Joint Managhg Director, 5-9-194, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad-b1 ' 2.
The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Rep.by Gdneral Manager, The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Rep.by the Chairman, -Board Of Directors, 5-9-194, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad-01 .RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of Respondents 2 and 3 in proceeding with superannuation notice dt.06-04-20'1 7 there by making petitioner to retire from service from 31-12-2017 without treating him on par with similarly situated employees whose services have been enhanced in pursuance of Circular.No.HRD/15 Dt.26-09-2017 as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to continue the petitioner in service until he attains the age of 60 years by treating him on par with other employees whose superannuation age has been enhanced by Circular. No. HRD I 1 5, D|.26- 09-2017 .
lA NO: 1 OF 2017 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to consider the Representation dt.14-09-2017 on merits for continuing petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years by treating him on par with other employees whose superannuation age has been enhanced by Circular.No.HRD/l 5 Dt.26-Og-2017. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI N.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondents No.2to5 : SRI Y.N.LOHITHA The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PTTITION No.44652 of 2Ol7 ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on O2.O8.2O23, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner in morning session, as well as afternoon session. To give one opportunity, the matter was posted to 09.O8.2O23. On 09.08.2023 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give final opportunity, the matter was posted to I 1.08.2023 under the caption "'for dismissal".
2.
Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, in spite of the matter is being listed under the caption "for dismissal". It appears that the petitioner is not having any interest to prosecute the case.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI FFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI N.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, Advocate. [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR INDUSTRIES AND COTMMERCE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI Y.N.LOHITHA, Advocate. [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies.
BSK GJP ft^c,, i
HIGH COURT DATED:1 110812023 L c \s.
., '\ 1/.'i , (_'
""S & q$ lrf _+ ,t /.
,?
\
ORDER
WP.No.44652 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS f(q 26\d'}-3