Shashikala v. State Of Telangana
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN : PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI CRLP .No. 24635 of 2017 Between:- Smt Shashikala, W/o. Balraj.
..... Petitioners/Accused No.2.
AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, In the High Court Of Judicature at Hyderabad, For the State of Telangana and the State of A.P., Hyderabad, through P.S. Medipally, Rachakonda Commissioner ate. .
.....Respondent/Complainant.
Petition filed under Sections 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/Accused No.2 in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr.No. 111 of 2015 of P.S. Medipally. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. Rajesh, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Public Prosecutor(TS) on behalf of Respondent-State, the Court made the following ORDER :- "This petition is filed seeking for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who is A2, in Crime No.111 of 2015 on the file of Medipally Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. The offences alleged are under Section 306 of IPC.
2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the inquest report reflects different story from the one reflected in the complaint. The dispute between the deceased and this accused related to the pledging of gold ornament of this petitioner and it appears that she uttered to the deceased that since she did not release her gold ornament, her son died. However, the counsel submits that A1 in this case is already enlarged on bail.
4. Hence, considering the above circumstances, this court opines that this is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed.
The petitioner is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Medipally Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, within 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the said Station House Officer. Further, on such release, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions mentioned under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., as under:
(i) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. Contd..2...
- 2 - (ii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed."
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Redd District At L.B. Nagar,Hyderabad, Telangana State.
2.The Station House Officer, Medipally Police Station Ranga Reddy District. 3.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor(TS), High Court at Hyd.(OUT) 4.One CC to Sri P. Rajesh, Advocate(OPUC) 5.One spare copy.
TKK
HIGH COURT TR.J DT.23-01-2018.
ANTICIPTORY BAIL ORDER CRL.P.No. 24635 of 2017 RELEASE THE PETITONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HER ARREST
DRAFTED BY TKK DT.24-01-2018.
HIGH COURT TR.J DT.23-01-2018.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRL.P.No. 24635 of 2017 RELEASE THE PETITONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HER ARREST.