← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/24701/2017allowed no costs

Neeli Joy And 3 Others v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By P.P

2018-01-19T. Rajani3 pages

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN : PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.RAJANI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 24701 of 2017 Between:

1. Neeli Joy, S/o Lokesh (A-3)

2. Thota Kalyan, S/o Krishna (A-4)

3. Shaik Muzakeer, S/o Abdul Nabi (A-5)

4. Arava Bhumi Sujan Krishna Reddy@Chintu,S/oLate vijaya Bhaskar Reddy (A-6) Petitioners/Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, V Town Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 411 of 2017 of V Town Police Station, Nellore, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. Vijaya Saradhi, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor (AP) for the Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed seeking for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, who are accused Nos.3 to 6, in Crime No.411 of 2017 on the file of V Town Police Station, Nellore, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. The offences alleged are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307 and 323 R/w 149 I.P.C. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are students and if they are sent to jail, their future career would get spoiled. Further, accused Nos.1 and 2 were already enlarged on bail.

4.

The allegations against the petitioners are that the petitioners beat the de-facto complainant, on the ground that he was teasing the female students. 5.

Hence, considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the nature of offences involved in this case, the Criminal Petition is allowed.The petitioners/accused Nos.3 to 6 are directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, V Town Police Station, Nellore, S.P.S.R. Nellore District, within 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the petitioners/accused Nos.3 to 6 shall be released on bail on each of their executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the said Station House Officer. Further, on such release, the petitioners/accused Nos.3 to 6 shall abide by the conditions mentioned under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1. The IV Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Nellore

2. The V Town Police Station, Nellore, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor (AP), High Court, Hyd(OUT)

4. One CC to Sri G. Vijaya Saradhi, Advocate(OPUC)

5. One spare copy.

Skm

HIGH COURT TR,J Drafted by: skm Drafted on: 22-1-2018 DATED: 19-01-2018

ORDER

CRL.P.NO. 24701 OF 2017 DIRECTION