Sangem Praveen Goud v. The State Of Telangana

[ 32se l tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION GASE NO: 429 0F 2024 criminal Revision case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Gr.PC against the order dated 20-08-2015 made in M.C.No.7 0l 2014 0n the file of the court of the Junior civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate of First class, at Narsapur. Between:

SangemPraveenGoud,s/o.AshokGoud,agedabout30years,occ.Private Serv]ce, R/o.H.No.2-52, Raidurgam village, Serilingampally Mandal' Ranga ReddY District.

"'Petitioner ANDi. T6" St"t" of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana and for the State ofAndhra Pradesh, Hyderabad'

2. Smt. Sangem Gyneshwari, Wo. S. Praveen Goud, aged about 26 years' Occ' Housewif6, R/o. Gummadidala village, Jinnaram (M), Medak District'

3. Sangem Rajveer Goud, S/o. Praveen Goud, ag.ed about 5 years' Minor' rep' uyz"norespondentwhoishisguardianbeinghismotherRl/o.Gummadidala village, Jinnaram (M), Medak District'

...Respondents

t.A. NO:2OF 2016(CRLRCMP. NO:50246.oF 2016) Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Revision case, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further Proceedings in pursuant to the order.dated 20-08-2015 in M.C.No.7 ot 2014 including stay of NBW daled o4-02-2o16 passed in crl'M.P.No'2239 of 2016 in M.C.No.7 of 2014 pending disposal of main revision'

Counsel for the Petitioner :Sri M Damodar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No'1 : Sri Vizarath Ali' Assistant Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondents No'2 & 3 : Sri T B B Krishna Mohan The Court made the following: ORDER I I !

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.429 OF 2024 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the unofficial respondent would submit that the disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent have been settled and they are living together and the offences which have been registered against the petitioner herein have been settled and therefore, seeks to dismiss this Criminal Revision Case as infructuous 2.

Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public Prosecutor reported no objection for the same 3.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed SD/. B SATYAVATHI, DEPUW REGISTRAR.

Itr- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Junior Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Narsapur.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri M Damodar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to Sri T B B Krishna Mohan, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies ADK o Y_

HIGH COURT DATED:0210212024 k THE s14 16 ( ? 01 ,tut tnt (,

ORDER

t { tt .Sp4aCpr€.O CRLRC.No.429 of 2024 DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS v\