United India Insurance Company Limited v. Gonda Kishtaiah And 3 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTTCE SAMBASTVAR^A,Q NATDU Ir{.4.c.i14. No: 27 oF ?g18 Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles ACt, against the Judgment i decrge in QF No.69S of 2013 dated 2StO2l2O16 on the fite of the CAurt of the Motgr Accidents Claims Tribunal (1st Additional District Judge), Nizamabad. 'l BETWEEN:

United India Insurance Company LH., Represented by its local Divisional l'"lanager, Divisignal Office, Nebr Mayuri Hotel, Godown Road, Nizamabad ... AppellanV Respqndent Nq.2 AND

(1) Sri Gonda Kishtaiah S/o Sri.Yellappa. Age: 55 years,

(2) M9. Gonda Anjawa, D/o Sri. Gonda Kishtaiah, -, Agei 25 ygars, Household,

(3) Ms. GondA Vittabai @ Anitha, D/o Sri. Gonda Kishtaiah, Age: 23 ygars, Household, All are R/o Pedda (odapagal Viilage, Now residing at H.No.6-22-702, : , , Rbjqevnaga'r, Dubba, Nizamabad ,, ,Respgn(ent5l , Claim Petitiglqrs (6fr Mahin(ra and Mahindra Limiied rep. by its Manager, Owner of Mahindra Bolero Van bearing No,AP-23-TC-452, Office at near Bidar T Junction, l'lahindranagar, Zaheerabad; Medak District-502 220 !.;i Responden( Respondent No. I .r'( "/ For the Appellant : SRI V.KRISHNA RAO, Advocate (not appeared) \ For the Respondent No.4 : SRt G.ANANO KUMAR, Mvocate Forthe Respondent Nos.l to 3 : SRt P.RADHIV REDOY, Advocate The Coqrt delivered the foltowing: JUDGMENT q

j THE HON'BLE SRI .IUS'I'ICT] SAMI]ASIVA RAO NAIDU MACMA No.27 of 20lE JUDGMT]NT:

i Learned counsel for the respondents No.l and 4 are preserrt.

The mafter is lisred roday under the caption .for dismissal' and there is no representation for the appellant. Ther€f6re, the appeal is dismissed for non_prosecution. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

t lnRuEcopY/t .dJJ#fHEAKUMAR i TO 1, g;;ffi,,,ff#r*nli*Elst"

;:;::r'Yr.

t ) 2.

e i 4.

5.

6.

Kj.

.}rJ i !

i t_ ::-E:-,+-:

- -- -- <:3--

HIGH COURT DATED:Oafi6t2022 \rg SIArF g 11 N$i ?$[L c) c :, DES:',4.

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.27 of 2018 fl,"t#ffi.%r#:

n4 A c M A FoR N o N- pRo sEcu T,oN @ 1r:0 \t)