Akkaldev Yadaiah (Died) And 7 Othrs v. Amruthesh Enterprises, Hyd And 4 Othrs

[ 3158 ] (sHow cAUSE NOTTCE BEFORE ADMtSStON) HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 227 OF 2020 Between:

Smt. C.Swetha, Wo Tadepu Pramod Kumar Aged about 39 years Occ- House Wife, Petitioner AND

1. Sri.Tadepu Pramod Kumar, S/o T Narsing Rao Aged about 45 years OccBusiness, Native of Nizamabad District, R/o H.No- 8-1-44, Block 1, Flat No.14, Tirumala Homes, Bowenpally, Secunderabad, .. Respondent 2 The State of Telangana, through P.P, High Court at Hyderabad .. Proforma Respondent WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through her Advocate SRI SATISH KUMAR VARMA presented this Revision filed under Section 397 and 40 1 of Cr,P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed in the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the present revision by setting aside the Order passed by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case - Cum - Addl. Family Court - Cum - XXlll Addl, Chief Judge -Cum -lX Addl.

Metropolitan Session Judge at Hyderabad dated 14-10-2019 in M.C. 208 of 2014, directing the Respondent to pay an amount of Rs.B.000l per month to the Petitioner towards maintenance from the date of the Order and Consequently direct the Respondent to pay a sum of Rs.25,0001 per month from the date of filling M.C as claimed by the Petitioner in the interest of Justice. AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI SATISH KUMAR VARMA Advocate for the Petitio'ner, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No. t herein to show cause as to why this CRIMINAL REVISION CASE should not be admitted.

You viz:

Sri.Tadepu Pramod Kumar, S/o T Narsing Rao Occ- Business, Native of Nizamabad District, R/o H.No- 8-1-44, Block 1, Flat No.14, Tirumala Homes, Bowenpally, Secunderabad.

are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRIMINAL REVISION CASE should not be admitted.

The Court made the following: ORDER:- Notice before admission.

Personal notice to Rl by RPAD is permitted.

Post after service of notice.

Sd/- CH. VENKATESWARLU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Il7'/ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . Sri.Tadepu Pramod Kumar, S/o T Narsing Rao Occ- Business, Native of Nizamabad District, R/o H.No- 8-1-44, Block 1, Flat No.14, Tirumala Homes, Bowenpally, Secunderabad (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)

2. One CC to SRl. SATISH KUMAR VARMA Advocate [OPUC]

3. Twq C.Cs. to Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad.

4. One spare copy.

AGS

HIGH COURT GSD J DATED:2410212020 zr.'r-:"'FtX, /':'i:',''

'g\ l,',f {s 3li {,"' o"*$" ^.r?/ .' .,:/ NOTE: POST AFTER SERVICE OF NOTICE.

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CRLRC.No.227 of 2020