Kolluju Srinivasulu v. Smt. Kolluju Manjulatha

[ 32se ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 832 OF 2023 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of CrPC against the Order dated 15.04.2013 made in Crl.M.P. No.538 of 20'10 in M.C. No.32 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, at: Nalgonda.

Between:

Kolluju Srinivasulu, S/o. Sathyanarayana, aged about 35 years, Occ, BSF Constable No.950096640, Native of Thurkala Shapuram Of Gundala Mandal, Now at. Abbasia Colony , Nalgonda Town and District. ...PETTTTONER(S) AND '1. Smt. Kolluju Manjulatha, Wo. K. Srinivalusu, aged about 30 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. Abbasia Colony, Nalgonda Town and District.

2. The State of A.P., Rep by its P.P. HC of AP at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Raju for Sri L. Harish Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri E. Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.832 OF 2o.23 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is liled by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 15.04.2013 in Cr1.M.P.No.538 of 2O1O in M.C.No.32 of 2OO8 on the file of the learned Judge, Famil-y Court-cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nalgonda (for short, "the trial Court") wherein the learned Judge of the trial Court had granted interim maintenance of Rs.7,00O/- per month to respondent No. 1, payable by the petitioner, from the date of the order.

2.

Heard Mr.Raju, learned counsel representing Mr.L.Harish, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.E.Ganesh, Iearned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.2-State. 3.

l,earned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that this Court vide order dated 27.O4.2O22 in Cr1.R.C (SR) No.3198 of 2022 held that as against an interlocutory order, a Revision under Section 397 of Crimina-l Procedure Code is not maintainable. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss the Revision

i 4.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Criminal Revision Case at this stage, as the proceedings hereunder are covered by the order dated 27 .O4.2022 in Cr1.R.C (SR) No.3198 of 2022 passed by this Court.

5.

Accordingly, the Crimina,l Revision Case is dismissed. Needless to mention, the petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedies as available under law.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, sha-ll stand closed. Sd/- I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY EGI //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,l The Judge, Famlly Court-cum-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, at: Nalgonda.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri L. Harish, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies VH/gh I-t

i HIGH COURT l DATED: 2511112024 4\ C!

,* 24lr[ M

ORDER

CRLRC.No.832 ol 2023 DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C L