G.Narender Rao v. Santosh Kumar And 4 ORS
[ 3260 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY SECON D APPEAL NO: 922 0F 2014 f 8 %?'l oY i o;: ;"ii il, I Ri t:.';i,8, f gi'li!l&"
"i ifl S T: i I 3i !I {ii::i J i il?:
6it v'c,ir c ",,t, y v o u,, u, ouffi tt # :*ll r,"i1 :n },i,t #"J il 3 9l 31tl; daied 22 07 2008 on the lilt at Hyderabad.
Between:
G.Narender Rao s/o 131s $ Aniaiah'
i*::t ll",':'];' f tr 3''
a n d 4 6 4 i#$A' : l' I i1 f : [-? B:
APPELLANT AND ' i3:[i":[{lii"t# t"* t ffl?31, *'o '., *o '' 5-7'621'situated at Fish 'rtl"ri["t, a"qrr'Bazai, Hvderabad A P'
, 'd"6iinrl s% Lri" c nnlaian, Ased about s5 v931s' ' 5"""i"l.nli n%. Iz-a-isoA, ru6ttuguoa' secunderabad 'fl ":vs",sl;a#l,g'r*.Yllx5lmi!it{i1il,'J,}!fl r*"ll^," ' ii {sffi T;,yii r:lxsn:; lifl,ii 3[ H { i:$iii'" :: ",H n " "]*'l ;
5 A prameeta wto. n. rriiiila, adlJ ru"rt ao years,, occ: Housewife, R/o " ii N"ls-'Gi3, Balaii nagar, Puti'rbo*li' Koti' Hyderabad' RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl' PRAMOD KUMAR KEDIA Counsel for the Respondents: V JAGAPATHI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
/ HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH RBDDY S.A.No.922 of 2018 I JUDG NT:
Learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents are present.
- Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR L )t) SECIbN OFFICER //TRUE COPY// \ To,
1. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. The ll Senior Civil Judge City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
3. One CC to SRl. PRAMOD KUMAR KEDIAAdvocate tOpUCl
4. One CC to SRl. V JAGAPATHI Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Copy.
\ \\Y al'
fI HIGH GOURT DATED 2711012022 { .?
* Gr,N t ,( .or ,*a td hs I 'r'i *
JUDGMENT
SA.No .922 of 2018 DISMISSING THE SA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT ,,1 COSTS I yn 2Y