Vijay Pundalik Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

43.aba3.18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 499 OF 2018 Vijay Pundalik Patil.

..Applicant.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

..Respondents.

Mr. Anoop U. Patil, advocate for applicant.

Mr. Sanjiva Sawant a/w. Mr. B.K. Barve I/b. B.K. Barve and Co., for intervenor.

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for State.

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,JJ.

DATE : JUNE 20, 2018.

P. C. :

Learned APP submits that the investigation is completed in the present case. Chargeh-sheet is also filed. In view of this, learned Counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the applicant. Liberty as prayed for is granted.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that he would appear before the concerned Magistrate at Nashik on or before 29/6/2018. In view of this, the applicant stands protected till 5 p.m. of 29/6/2018.

Talwalkar

43.aba3.18.doc The learned Magistrate shall decide the application for bail on its own merits without being influenced by the withdrawal of the application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

Intervention application is heard, allowed and disposed of accordingly.

[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.] Talwalkar