Amol Hanumant Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra

rpa 1/2 production ba 10 2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2020 Amol Hanumant Gaikwad .. Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ......

Mr.Keshav S. Chavan, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent - State. ......

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATED :

APRIL 21st, 2021.

P.C. :

Not on Board. Mentioned.

This disposed of application is mentioned for Speaking to the Minutes of the order dated 19th April, 2021. In the cause title of the said order, the appearance of the counsel appearing for the parties are remained to be typed. Hence, the following appearance be inserted in the order dated 19th April, 2021:

"Mr.Keshav S. Chavan, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent - State." Further in paragraph 5 (ii) of the operative part of the

rpa 2/2 production ba 10 2021.doc said order, "CR No.418l of 2019" is typed, instead of "CR No.418 of 2018". Hence, the same be corrected and substituted as "CR No.418 of 2018". The order dated 19th April, 2021, stands corrected to that extent only. Necessary corrections be carried out in order dated 19th April, 2021, and corrected order be uploaded on the oficial Website.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)