Mrs. Neha Amol Barkul v. Mr. Amol Ramchandra Barkul

17.22.20 MCA.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2020 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2020 MRS. NEHA AMOL BARKUL ....APPLICANT V/s.

MR. AMOL RAMCHANDRA BARKUL .....RESPONDENT Mr. Ajinkya M. Udane for the applicant None for respondent CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

AUGUST 18, 2021.

P.C.:

1] None appears for non-applicant though served. Applicant-wife has initiated D.V. Proceedings being P.W. D.V. 143/2017 so also Restitution of Conjugal Rights proceedings being M.P. No. 199/2018 at Parbhani Court of which transfer is sought. It is claimed that applicant-wife, for education of her daughter, has shifted to Pune. 1/2

17.22.20 MCA.doc 2] Considering the fact that applicant is custodian of a daughter and though served, non-applicant has not objected the prayer for transfer, particularly in the background of the fact that he being resident of Pune, in my opinion, application needs to be allowed. 3] Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2021.08.18 19:01:07 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL 2/2