Reena Ankit Agarwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

rsk 1/1 21-APL-1-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1 OF 2019 Reena Ankit Agarwal ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

---- Mr.Rathod i/b Mr. Ashraf Patel for the Applicant. Ms.Shilpa Nagori for Respondent Nos.2 to 6.

Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for the Respondent-State.

---- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 17/01/2019.

P.C.:

.

Applicant-wife who has lodged FIR on 26/1/2015 under sections 498(A), 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w. 34 against respondent Nos.2 to 6 is before this Court for quashing it. She is present with her counsel. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are also present with their counsel. Parties jointly point out that in proceedings instituted by the applicant before the Family Court, Consent Terms have been recorded already and those proceedings have now been converted into proceedings under section 13(b) of The Hindu Marriage Act for grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent. We have perused clause 5 and 10 therein.

2.

In view of this development and joint request, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (A).

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)