Ramzan Jamil Sayad And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

V.A. Tikam 29- WP 27 of 2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2016.

Ramzan Jamil Sayed and Ors.

.. Petitioners vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2024.02.08 16:46:10 +0530 Ms. Deepa Panicker for the Petitioners.

Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent N o.1-State. CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATE : 1st FEBRUARY, 2024 P. C.:- 1) Record indicates that, the Advocate for the Petitioners had sought adjournments on 12th January, 2016 and 28th January, 2016 That, on 10th March, 2016, none had appeared for the Petitioners. It appears that, after 11th April, 2016, the Advocate for the Petitioners and/or the Petitioners did not take any efforts even to circulate the Petition. Today also an adjournment is sought by Ms. Deepa Panicker on some trifle grounds. It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the Petition.

2) Dismissed for want of prosecution.

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1