Anita Ravi Papadkar v. Ravi Dattu Papadkar

3. civil wp 130-17.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 130 OF 2017 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2015 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2014 Anita Ravi Papadkar ..

Petitioner

Versus

Ravi Dattu Papadkar ..

Respondent ...................

Appearances Ms. Bhavana Y. Tandel Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.N. Shaikh Advocate for the Respondent ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 6, 2017.

P.C.:

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that all the arrears of maintenance have been cleared, hence, she does not wish to pursue this Contempt Petition.

2.

In view of above, this petition is disposed of as not pressed.

[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 1