Santosh Kumar Mishra S/O Ghanshyam Mishra v. Parmeshwar Bacchu Tiwari And ORS

903.2.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2016 in REVISION APPLICATION (St) NO.2 of 2016 Santosh Kumar Mishra .... Applicant V/s.

Parmeshwar Tiwari & ors .... Respondents Applicant appearing in person Mr.A.R.Kapadnis APP for State CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J.

DATE : 27 JANUARY 2017 P.C. :

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 75 days in filing the Revision Application.

2.

Heard the Applicant who is appearing in person. None for respondent nos.1 to 3 though office noting shows that Mr.A.R.Dubey Advocate is appearing for them and that he has filed vakalatnama on their behalf.

3.

Heard the learned APP appearing for respondent no.4. Perused the averments made by the Applicant in his Application for seeking 1/2

903.2.16.doc condonation of delay. Application is on affidavit. The delay is properly explained. The reasons given in the application for condonation of delay in my opinion, constitutes sufficient cause. In this view of the matter, following order is passed:

(i) Application is allowed.

(ii) The delay in filing Revision Application is condoned. (A.M.Badar, J) 2/2