Hari @ Ramchandra Pandurang Yamgar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

22 WP.63.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.63 OF 2018 Hari @ Ramchandra Pandurang Yamgar ... Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Yogesh B. Dandekar i/b. Mr. Ranjeet Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the State.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

06.02.2018 P.C. :

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the learned JMFC, Court No. 4, Sangli, by which the learned Magistrate was pleased to allow the application filed by the prosecution for recording further examination-in-chief of Imran Pathan. 3.

Perused the order. Admittedly, the cross-examination of the said prosecution witness i.e. Imran Pathan had not commenced. 4.

In these circumstances, no infirmity can be found in the impugned order permitting the prosecution to conduct further Habeeb 1/2

22 WP.63.18.doc examination-in-chief of the said witness.

5.

Application is accordingly dismissed.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) Habeeb 2/2