Dhiraj Lakhamshi Shah v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

9-apl-31-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.31 OF 2022 Dhiraj Lakhamshi Shah ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

Mr. P. Shah, for the Applicant Mr. Moinuddin Cutlerywala i/b. SSB Legal & Advisory, for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 13.

Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State.

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2022.04.24 15:56:30 +0530 CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

APRIL 22, 2022 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 13.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant and respondent Nos. 2 to 13 amicably resolved the dispute and consent terms have been executed. 3.

Learned counsel tendered the consent terms before the Court. Mr. Dhiraj Shah, the applicant/accused and Mr. Tushar Chheda, respondent No. 13/complainant are present before the Court. They admit the contents of the consent terms and execution thereof. 4.

The consent terms are taken on record and marked X for identification.

5.

The undertakings in the consent terms are accepted as Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...1

9-apl-31-2022.doc undertakings to the Court.

6.

In view of the consent terms, the applicant seeks leave to unconditionally withdraw the application.

7.

The application stands disposed as withdrawn. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...2