Chandrakant Dadu Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

sjs 9-APPP-10.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE - CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2015 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.2299 OF 2014 Chandrakant Dadu Patil .... Applicant/ Intervener In the matter between Silvester Sanjay Koli .... Applicant/ Accused Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. B.G. Tangsali for the Intervener.

Mr. A.H.H. Ponda i/b Mr. Datta Mane for the Applicant/Accused.

Ms A.T. Javeri, APP, for the RespondentState. CORAM: P.D. KODE, J.

DATED: JANUARY 16, 2015 P.C:

1.

Having regard to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Sudeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra and Another, reported in AIR 2014 SC 1745, and particularly the

sjs 9-APPP-10.2015 observations made in para 56, it is difficult to entertain the prayer for intervention taken in bail application. Having regard to it as per the above referred decision, the intervener is not entitled to intervene in the bail proceedings. He will not have any right to interfere in the proceedings for bail. However, the intervener is at liberty to exercise the rights within four corners of Section 301 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

The application accordingly stands disposed of.

(P.D. KODE, J.)