← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/163/2008compromisedconsent terms

Shabbir Mohammadhusen Attar v. Smt. Nilawwa Channappa Halwai And ORS.

2016-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar2 pages

902.SA 163.08.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2008 Mr. Shabbir Mohammadhusen Attar.

... Appellant.

V/s.

Smt. Nilawwa Channappa Halwai & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Tejpal S. Ingale for the Appellant.

Mr. Nikhil Pawar for Respondent 1-A to 1-F. 1-G(1), 5 to 8, 9-1. Mr. Umesh Mankapure a/w. Shruti Kandoi for Respondents 4-3. CORAM : N.M. Jamdar, J.

30 June, 2016.

P.C. :- The amendment which has remained to be carried out be carried out during the course of the day. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties have executed the Consent terms and they have been signed by the Appellant and the Power of Attorney holder of Respondents. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to delete Respondent Nos. 10 to 12. The deletion is permitted at the risk of the parties who are executing the Consent terms.

902.SA 163.08.doc 2.

At the request of the learned Counsel for the parties, the Consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification, subject to verification by the Registry as regard the appearances of the parties and validity of the power of attorney. 3.

The Registry shall examine the position within period of two weeks from today. If the Consent terms are duly executed, it is not necessary to place the matter before the Court and the Registry can take further steps accordingly.

4.

The Second Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the Consent terms.

(N.M. Jamdar, J.)