Dr. Chetana Deshmukh v. Maharashtra Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary And ANR

915.WP.588.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 588 OF 2015 Dr. Chetana Deshmukh ... Petitioner V/s.

Maharashtra Public Service Commission through its Secretary & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for the Petitioner.

Mr. A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for the M.P.S.C.

Ms. Kavita Solanke, A.G.P. for the State.

CORAM : A.A. SAYED & MANISH PITALE, JJ.

DATE : 4th OCTOBER, 2017.

P.C. :

The learned A.G.P. has pointed out that the Writ Petition is not maintainable and the Petitioner would have to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. He states that even otherwise the Petitioner's grievance has been redressed since she has already been appointed as Nayab Tahsildar. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter.

waghmare/- 1/2

915.WP.588.15.doc Having regard to the fact that the Petitioner has already been appointed as Nayab Tahsildar, her grievance seems to have been redressed.

In the circumstances, Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(MANISH PITALE, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) waghmare/- 2/2