Sanjay Manikrao Dambre v. Rajendra Manikaro Dambre And ORS

1 / 2 29-WP-2743-16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2743 OF 2016 Sanjay Manikarao Dambre .... Petitioner versus Rajendra Manikrao Dambre & Ors.

.... Respondents .......

• None present for Petitioner.

• Mr. Ashutosh O. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 20th MARCH, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel Mr. Ashutosh Shukla states that the Suit No.4330 of 2008 filed by his client, the Original Plaintiff and the Respondent No.1 herein, is withdrawn before the City Civil Court at Mumbai. The copy of Roznama is produced by him. It is taken on record and marked '

X' for identification. He therefore submitted that nothing survives in the Petition. His statement is recorded and accepted. Nobody appears for the Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2023.03.21 14:11:05 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Petition.

Nesarikar

2 / 2 29-WP-2743-16.odt 2.

Based on these submissions made by learned counsel for the Respondent No.1, who was the Original Plaintiff in the suit, which is the subject matter of the Petition, the Petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. In case, the statement is found to be incorrect, the Petitioner is at liberty to make an application for revival of this Petition. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)