Collin Augustine Martis v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

27-apl-56-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2021 Collin Augustine Martis ...Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Chaitanya Malgaonkar i/b Melwyn Pereira for the Applicant. Mr. A.V. Saigaonkar for Respondent No. 3.

Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the State.

CORAM

:

NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

22 June 2022.

P.C. :

The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Application was filed on the premise that the FIR is to be quashed with the consent of Respondent No. 3 Complainant, however, Respondent No. 3 Complainant is not ready and the Application will be filed for seeking quashing of the FIR/charge sheet on merits. 2.

The learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the Application to file a fresh Application.

3.

Application is disposed of as withdrawn as above. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) MJ Jadhav 1/1