← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/86/2024disposed off

Santosh Sand @ Gujjar @ Santosh Sakharam Prajapati v. State Of Maharashtra

2024-01-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar3 pages

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 86 OF 2024 Santosh Sand alias Gujjar alias Santosh Sakharam Prajapati .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Maitreya Shukla, Advocate, for the Applicant Ms. M. H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE :

12.01.2024 P. C.

1.

Heard Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Ms. Mhatre, learned APP appearing for the Respondent - State.

2.

This Application is preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail. The relevant details are as under:- C. R. NO.

Date of Registration of F.I.R.

09.11.2019 Police Station Nashik Road Police Station, Nashik Sections Applied 302, 201 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Date of Incident 08.11.2019 Date of Arrest 20.02.2020 Date of fling of 22.02.2021

Charge-sheet 3.

The deceased is the wife of the Applicant-Accused No. 1. As per the prosecution case, the deceased was a habitual alcoholic. On 08.11.2019 at about 2.30 p. m. in the afternoon, the witnesses have found that there was a quarrel going on in the rented premises of the Applicant. In the said rented premises, the witnesses i.e. neighbours found that the deceased was consuming liquor along with Accused No. 2 - Mr. Dinesh Rathod and Accused No. 3 - Mr. Mukesh Pawar. As the neighbours were gathered outside the room of the Applicant, said Mr. Dinesh Rathod and Mr. Mukesh Pawar left the premises. Thereafter, on 09.11.2019 at 7.30 a. m., it was found that the deceased was lying unconscious. The case is of circumstantial evidence. The Post Mortem Examination Report shows that the cause of death is cerebral damage due to blunt trauma to the head. There is no recovery at the instance of the Applicant. The other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail.

4.

Ms. Mhatre, learned APP appearing for the Respondent - State vehemently opposes this Bail Application. However, the Charge-sheet has already been fled on 22.02.2021. The Applicant is incarcerated since the past four years. The trial is unlikely to conclude any time soon and is likely to take a

considerably long time. The present Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents.

5.

The Applicant does not appear to be a fight risk. 6.

Accordingly, the Applicant can be enlarged on bail by imposing conditions. Hence, the following order:- O R D E R (i) The Applicant - Mr. Santosh Sand alias Gujjar alias Santosh Sakharam Prajapati in connection with C. R. No. 705 of 2019 registered with the Nashik Road Police Station, Nashik shall be released on bail on his furnishing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

(ii) On being released on bail, the Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and residential address to the Investigating Offcer and shall keep him updated, in case there is any change;

(iii) The Applicant shall report to the Nashik Road Police Station, Nashik once every month, on every frst Sunday of the month between 11.00 a. m. and 1.00 p. m. till the conclusion of trial;

(iv) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Offcer;

(v) The Applicant shall not tamper with evidence; (vi) The Applicant shall regularly attend the trial; (vii) The Applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments; (viii) The Applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the Investigating Offcer.

7.

The Application is disposed of.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)