Mahendra H.Mirchandani v. Akshar Rachna And ORS.

3-APPEAL-524-2002.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.524 OF 2002 MAHENDRA H. MIRCHANDANI )...APPELLANT V/s.

AKSHAR RACHNA AND ORS.

)...RESPONDENTS None for the Appellant.

Ms.N.S.Jain, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :

16th AUGUST 2017 P.C. :

None for the appellant. It is seen from the office endorsement that notice issued to respondents could not be served because of incorrect address. It is also seen that advocate for the appellant has not furnished correct address. Even notice issued to newly added respondent no.5 is reported to have received back with an endorsement that the same is received after due date. avk 1/2

3-APPEAL-524-2002.doc In this view of the matter, the appellant to take necessary steps for effecting service on unserved respondent nos.1 to 3 and 5, within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Respondent no.4 is the formal party i.e. State of Maharashtra.

Stand over to 13th September 2017.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) avk 2/2