Chinmayee Ashish Gangawane v. Ashish Mohan Gangawane

10-MCA-197-2021.doc BDP-SPS-TAC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2022.03.21 16:54:38 +0530 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.197 OF 2021 Chinmayee Ashish Gangawane ....Applicant V/s.

Ashish Mohan Gangawane .....Respondent ---- Mr. Vaibhav Patankar, i/by Patankar & Associates, for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.

---- CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : MARCH 21, 2022 P.C.:- 1] None appears for the non-applicant, though served 2] After matrimonial discord, parties hereto initiated matrimonial proceedings. Applicant is informed to be the custodian of minor daughter who is aged about 3 years. Though notice in the proceedings is served upon the non-applicant, he has chosen not to appear in the matter.

3] In response to the Court'

s query Counsel for the Applicant informs that Applicant is not receiving any maintenance. 4] In the aforesaid backdrop, issue of hardship is well established in 1/2

10-MCA-197-2021.doc favour of the Applicant. That being so, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under:- "a) the records and proceedings of Marriage Petition PA No.1379 of 2019 which is pending before the Ld. Judge Family, Court-3, Pune be transferred to the Ld. Family Court, Thane;"

5] I am informed that D.V. Act proceedings initiated by the Applicant are also pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Thane.

6] Application is disposed of.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2