Niraj Mansukhlal Ved v. The State Of Maharashtra

Nalawade FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2018 Niraj Mansukhlal Ved vs. The State of Maharashtra WITH CRIMINAL APPICATION NO. 51 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO. 148 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO.185 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2018 WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2018 Swagat M. Jagirdar vs. State of Maharashtra Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Bhavesh Thakur i/by B.J. Joshi for the Applicant in ABA No.143/2018.

Ms. Pooja Shejpal i/by Nitin Shejpal for the Applicant in Appliction No.51/2018.

Mr. Piyush Toshniwal i/by Aashish Satpute for the applicant in ABA NO.64/2018.

Mr. M.G. Shukla for the intervener in Application No.84/2018.

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

DATE : 03rd July, 2018 P.C.

1.

By an Order dated 10.1.2018 the applicant in ABA Page-1/3

No.43/2018 and by an order dated 15.1.2018 the applicant in ABA No.64/2018 were granted interim relief by this Court. The record indicates that in furtherance of the Oder dated 25.1.2018 the applicant Niraj Ved has deposited the alleged amount of Rs.3,26,00,000/- in the registry of this Court. The applicant Sagar Jagirdar is an employee of Mr. Niraj Ved and it is the prosecution case that, a power of attorney was given to him by Niraj Ved for registration of the certain documents. As far as the allegation of accepting money is concerned, the same revolves around the applicant Niraj Ved. As noted earlier, in pursuance of Order dated 25.1.2018 Niraj Ved has deposited the said amount of Rs.3,26,00,000/- in the registry of this Court. 2.

In view of the above, the interim relief granted to the applicants namely Niraj Ved and Swagat Jagirdar by Orders dated 10.1.2018 and 15.1.2018 are hereby confirmed. However, the condition to attend the Investigating Officer is waived.

3.

The anticipatory bail applications are allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Page-2/3

3. In view of the order passed in ABA No.43/2018 and ABA No. 64/2018, the aforestated intervention applications do not surive and are accordingly disposed off.

4. The interveners are granted liberty to have amicable settlement with the applicant Shri. Niraj Ved and allowing the application of the applicant-Niraj Ved for pre-arrest bail shall not preclude the interveners for having an amicable settlement with him in the matter.

5.

Applications are disposed off in the aforesaid terms. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) Page-3/3