Ankur Narayanlal Panwar v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba.63.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2015 Ankur Narayanlal Panwar ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Ganesh Gole i/b Ms. Rashmi Gagwani for the Applicant Ms. Aruna S. Pai, A.P.P for the Respondent-State API Mr. V. T. Tawde from DCB CID, ARD Cell is present CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

THURSDAY, 7 th MAY, 2015 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

At the outset, learned A.P.P states that the trial in the present case has already commenced and four witnesses have already been examined in the said case.

3.

Considering the aforesaid, no interference is warranted at this stage. Accordingly, the application is rejected. 4.

The trial Court to make an endeavour to conclude the trial within 9 months from the date of receipt of this order. SQ Pathan 1/2

ba.63.15.doc 5.

It is made clear that if for some reason, the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid time, for no fault of the applicant, the applicant shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after 9 months. 6.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2