Shri Satish Kisandas Khivansara v. Shri Paras Nenmal Jain And Others

Tapadia RR/B.74 1/2 CAS/869/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 869 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 820 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders.

Mr. Samrat Shinde i/b Mr. T.D.Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Vishal Muglikar i/b Mr. Mayur Dilip Joglekar, Advocate for Respondent no 1.

Mr. Manoj Badgujar i/b Mr. A. P. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3.

Respondent no.4/B to 4/F, 5A to 5C and 6 are served CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J.

DATE : 24/04/2015 PC:

1.

Heard Mr. Samrat Shinde, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Vishal Muglikar, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. Manoj Badgujar, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3.

Respondents no.4B to 4F, 5A to 5C are served. Respondent no.4A died leaving behind respondent no.4B.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application which are not controverted, I am satisfied that the applicant has made

2/2 CAS/869/2014 out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) with no order as to costs. Office is directed to register Appeal, if it is otherwise ready.

(R.G.KETKAR, J.)