Usha Parikh @ Shah v. The State Of Maharashtra
39.APPPNo.212015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.599 OF 2013 [(For leave to appeal (Private)] Smt.Usha Parikh @ Shah ...
Applicant V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...
Respondents .....
Mr.Rajiv J.Mane Applicant in person present.
Mr.A.K.Singh i/b. K.Mano Prabhakaran, , Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State. ....
CORAM :
ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.
DATED :
27TH APRIL 2015 P.C.
1.
Heard.
2.
The office note shows that the record has been reconstructed.
3.
The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 5 submits that the same has been reconstructed without any assistance from him.
Gaikwad RD 1/2
39.APPPNo.212015 4.
If the office could reconstruct the record without the assistance of the learned counsel for the respondents, then there is nothing wrong or improper in it. A copy of the application, after its reconstruction, has been given to the learned counsel for the respondents, just now.
5.
Heard.
6.
The order of dismissal is recalled.
7.
The application for leave to appeal be listed on board for admission on 7th May 2015.
(ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.) Gaikwad RD 2/2