Samarth Krida Va Sanskrutik Mandal v. The State Of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.111 OF 2016 Samarth Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.90 OF 2016 Vakratunda Kala Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.91 OF 2016 Waqt Kala Krida Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.3527 OF 2015 Jolly Social Club Sawantwadi ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.4381 OF 2015 Shree Mateshwar Kala Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.4575 OF 2015 Dhanashri Kala Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.4576 OF 2015 Bramhand Kala Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Shubhada S Kadam 1/4
with WRIT PETITION NO.4577 OF 2015 Jay Malhar Kala Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.4932 OF 2015 Vijeta Kala Krida Sanskrutik Vs Manoranjan Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.4937 OF 2015 Chandrachaya Kala Krida va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent with WRIT PETITION NO.4938 OF 2015 Bhuvaneshwari Kala Krida Va Sanskrutik Mandal ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Manoj A. Patil, advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions. Mr. S. K.Shinde, PP along with Mrs. S.V. Sonawane, APP for the State in writ petition Nos.111/2016, 90/16, 91/16,3527/16, 4381/15, 4937/15 and 4938/15.
Mr. S. K. Shinde, PP along with Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State in writ petition Nos. 4575/15 to 4577/15 and writ petition No.4932/15 CORAM : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATE : 1st MARCH, 2016.
P. C. :
These are the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioner prays for issuance Shubhada S Kadam 2/4
of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to enter the premises of the petitioner society/mandal/trust, without following the procedure prescribed by law.
The learned APP states, on instructions, that the authorities have always followed the procedure, and the petitioner has not complained of any breach of the procedure followed by the respondents.
The learned APP, however, states that whenever an occasion would arise to effect entry in the premises of the petitioner society/mandal/trust, the respondents would obviously follow the procedure established by law.
We accept the aforesaid statement as an undertaking to the Court.
The learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore, states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw these petitions, as this Court has accepted the statement made by the learned APP as an undertaking to the Court.
Shubhada S Kadam 3/4
The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn accepting the statement made by the learned APP as an undertaking to the Court.
[V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 4/4