Dattatraya Pandit Gholap v. State Of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary And ORS

* 1/2 * 908.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.966 OF 2015 Dattatray Pandit Gholap ....Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents Mr.G.G.Gavnekar with Mr. Gautam Hiranandani, Advocates for Petitioner.

Mr.C.P.Yadav,AGP for the Respondent-State.

****** CORAM :- CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI & B.R.GAVAI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 6TH OCTOBER, 2017.

6TH OCTOBER, 2017.

P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Rekapally Laxminarayanrao Naidu v. Union of India and Ors. reported in 1986 Mh.L.J. 838, all service matters including the matters pertaining to the selection process are required to be heard by the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Since the present matter pertains to selection of a Assistant Professor in a Government College, the matter would lie before the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Shivgan

* 2/2 * 908.doc The Petition is, therefore, rejected relegating the Petitioner to an alternative remedy available in law. Needless to state that the Petitioner would be entitled to benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for a period during which present petition was pending before this Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (B.R.GAVAI, J) (B.R.GAVAI, J) Shivgan