← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/324/2020disposed off

Subhash Ramchandra Gavali Through Poa S.V. Bhosale v. The Collector Of Sangli And ORS

2020-01-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice C.V. Bhadang3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 324 OF 2020 Subhash Ramchandra Gavali Through POA S.V. Bhosale ..Petitioner V/s.

The Collector of Sangli & Ors.

..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 326 OF 2020 Sunil Ragunath Patil ..Petitioner V/s.

The Collector of Sangli & Ors.

..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 327 OF 2020 Pradeep A. Patil Through POA V.A. Satale ..Petitioner V/s.

The Collector of Sangli & Ors.

..Respondents ---- Mrs.Veena Thadani a/w Ms.Priyanka Raul i/b Mr.Vishal Thadani for the Petitioners in all Writ Petitions.

Mr.A.P. Vanrase, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No.324 of 2020 and 326 of 2020.

Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No.327 of 2020.

---- CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J.

DATE : 14th JANUARY 2020 P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for the respondents.

N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3

2.

The limited challenge in these petitions is to the order passed by the Collector (State Excise), Sangli thereby imposing a privilege fee in addition to the composition fee. The contention is that once the matter has been compounded by payment of composition fee there is no authority to levy privilege fee. For this purpose the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Rule-6 of the Privilege Fees Rules framed under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act.

3.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader points out that a statutory appeal filed by the petitioner against the said order is pending before the Commissioner (State Excise), Maharashtra State where the petitioner can agitate the said ground. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the appeal is not yet heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner shall deposit the composition fee within one week.

5.

Considering overall circumstances, in my view these petitions can be disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner (State Excise) to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner within a N.S. Kamble page 2 of 3

period of 12 weeks from the receipt hereof. In the meanwhile there shall not be any coercive steps taken in respect of the imposition of privilege fee, subject to the petitioner depositing the composition fee as ordered within one week. In the event if the composition fee is not deposited within one week the aforesaid order shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court. 6.

The parties to appear before the Commissioner (State Excise) on 20th January 2020 at 3.00. p.m.

7.

Rival contention on merits are left open.

8.

Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. C.V. BHADANG, J.

Nilam Kamble Nilam Kamble Date: 2020.01.14 22:49:28 +0530 N.S. Kamble page 3 of 3