Bombay High CourtAPPW/21/2017others disposed off

Midopa Holdings Pvt.Ltd (Now Known As Aggresar Leasing And Finance Pvt Ltd) v. Shree Krishna Polyester Ltd. (Now Known As K-Lifestyle And Industries Ltd.) And ANR

2017-02-02Hon'Ble Smt. Justice R.P. Sondurbaldota6 pages

1/6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1251 OF 2002 Midopa Holdings Pvt. Ltd Applicant CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.780 OF 2002 Lotus Finance & Investments Pvt.Ltd.....

Applicant CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.781 OF 2002

2/6 Applicant CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.779 OF 2002 Applicant Respondent Mr. Akash Menon a/w Mr. Gourav Mohanty i/by Ameya Gokhale, for the applicants in APPW No 21 of 2017 to APPW No. 24 of 2017 Mr. Ajit Anekar a/w Mr. Thomas James i/by Auris Legal for Respondents APPW No 21 of 2017 to APPW No. 24 of 2017. Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, APP for the State APPW No 21 of 2017 to APPW No. 24 of 2017.

3/6 Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.

Date : 2nd February, 2017 P.C.

This is a common order on the above Criminal Applications, which are for restoration of the respective writ petitions. Both the advocates inform the court that the dispute is settled between the parties. In view of the settlement between the parties of the dispute represented in the writ petitions, the Criminal Applications are allowed. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)

4/6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1251 OF 2002 Midopa Holdings Pvt. Ltd Petitioner WRIT PETITION NO.780 OF 2002 Lotus Finance & Investments Pvt.Ltd.....

Petitioner WRIT PETITION NO.781 OF 2002 Petitioner

5/6 WRIT PETITION NO.779 OF 2002 Petitioner Respondent Mr. Akash Menon a/w Mr. Gourav Mohanty i/by Ameya Gokhale, for the Petitioners Mr. Ajit Anekar a/w Mr. Thomas James i/by Auris Legal for Respondents.

Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, APP for the State.

Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.

Date : 2nd February, 2017 P.C.

Not on board. By consent taken on board.

Both the advocates inform that the dispute

6/6 represented in the petitions is settled between the parties. Hence, the Writ Petitions are disposed off in terms of prayer clause (b).

(Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)