Shri. Sandeep Shantaram Savant And ORS. v. Lt. Vithoba Nana Darekar Since Deceased Through Lrs.,

35 caw 134.18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 30863 OF 2017 Shri Sandeep Shantaram Savant and ors.

......Applicants In the matter between Lt. Vithoba Nana Darekar Since Deceased through Lrs.

1. Shri Dadabhau Vithoba Darekar and anr.

......Petitioners

Versus

The Deputy Resettlement Officer, Pune and ors. ......Respondents Mr. Y. B. Lengare i/b. Mr. Jotiram Jadhav, advocate for the applicants. Mr. Vilas Jadhav i/b. Smt. Samidha S. Dongare, advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & PRAKASH D. NAIK, J J.

DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2018.

P. C. :

Having heard learned counsel and learned AGP appearing for the respective parties, we find that the applicants would be affected by the outcome of the writ petition inasmuch as they claim to have purchased the disputed land from the allottee. In the light of the above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed of as such.

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

35 caw 134.18.doc 2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead the applicants as party respondents. Necessary amendment be carried out within one week from today. The copy of the amended petition be served upon the added respondents within a period of one week thereafter.

[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2