Avinash Punjabi v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

rsk 1/1 29-WP-143-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.143 OF 2019 Avinash Punjabi

...Petitioner

vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

---- Mr.Karan Kadam i/b Ms. Mrunmai Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr.Maitrex Shukla for the Respondent No.2.

Mr. Dinkar I., PSI, Cuffe Parade Police station. ---- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 29/01/2019.

P.C.:

.

Heard. Respective counsel for the parties jointly requests for quashing of FIR No.11/2018 under sections 353, 332, 363 and 504 of IPC. Respondent No. No.2 has placed on record affidavit stating that the grievance is redressed and he does not wish to prosecute the matter. 2.

The facts narrated in police report show the accident and thereafter the conduct of the petitioner owner in an anxiety to recover the loss caused to his vehicle.

3.

In the situation, accepting the joint request we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)