Janvi Talwar v. Vikas Vinod Talwar

1 wp-328.19.doc pmw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.328 OF 2019 Janvi Talwar ... Petitioner Vs.

Vikas Vinod Talwar ... Respondent Ms. Swapna P. Kode for the Petitioner.

Ms. Taubon F. Irani for the Respondent.

CORAM: SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : 20th SEPTEMBER 2019.

P.C. :

1.

There is no reason for interfering with the order passed by the Family Court refusing to call the respondent for cross-examination as the only reason stated for recalling the witness is to prove the salary and to produce the entire copy of the passport. It is stated in the order that salary certificate is on record. In view of this, the issue no.1 would be closed. As far as passport is concerned, the learned counsel submits that it was only in order to substantiate that most of the days of the scheduled access the respondent is not in the country. Be that as it may, the issue in the main petition is only modification of the consent terms and it would be necessary to expedite the matter once again as the scheduled time for disposal, was February 2019. In view of this, the order for expeditious trial is however reiterated. The matter stands expedited. No orders. The petition stands disposed of.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)