Sangita @ Kajal Muktar Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Nikita 1 / 2 5-aba-69-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2024 Sangita @ Kajal Muktar Shaikh ...Applicant NIKITA KAILAS DARADE versus NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2024.01.15 12:21:47 +0630 The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.... Respondents Mr. Abhishek R. Avachat a/w S. H. Deshpande a/w Majhar Mujawar for the applicant.

Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 12th JANUARY 2024 P.C. :

1.

At the very outset, learned APP points out that this applicant had preferred Anticipatory Bail Application No.2053 of 2023, which was rejected by the co-ordinate bench of this Court. (Coram: Amit Borkar J.) by a reasoned order dated 21st July 2023. The said fact is not mentioned in the present application. There is suppression of fact.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has not informed the learned counsel about the earlier

2 / 2 5-aba-69-2024.odt order passed in Anticipatory Bail Application 2053 of 2023. 3.

Considering the earlier reasoned order and suppression of facts, I am not entertaining this application. 4.

The Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)