Ravindra Shivaji Pagar v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

11.ia-111-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3011 OF 2021 Ravindra Shivaji Pagar ....Applicant/ Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Nimesh Kirti Chhatbar ..... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Kiran Nikam, Advocate for the Applicant/Intervener. Mr. Vinay Bhanushali, Advocate for the Applicant in ABA/3011/2021.

Smt. J. S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 17th JANUARY, 2022 [Through Video Conferencing] P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the applicant in ABA No.3011/2021 does not have any objection if the interim application is allowed and if the intervener is allowed to participate in the anticipatory bail application. Considering this concession, the intervention application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

: 2 :

11.ia-111-22.odt 2.

Learned counsel for the original applicant shall amend the title of the application and add the intervener as respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the intervener waives service for the added respondent in anticipatory bail application.

3.

Interim Application is disposed of accordingly. PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2022.01.20 17:05:12 +0530 (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS)