Farhan Adam Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 06-aba-87-22(f)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 87 OF 2022 Farhan Adam Shaikh .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mr. Rumman Shaikh h/f. Husen Shaikh for Applicant. Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for State/Respondent.

______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 18th JANUARY, 2022 (through Video Conferencing) P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the applicant. The allegations regarding offence under sections 354 and 506 of IPC are made against another accused and not against the present applicant.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application in view of the statement made by learned APP. He also makes a statement that the applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called and shall co-operate with the VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date: 2022.01.19 13:10:40 +0530 Gokhale

2 / 2 06-aba-87-22(f) investigation. This statement is also recorded and accepted. 3.

In view of these statements, nothing survives in this application.

4.

The application is disposed of as not pressed. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)