← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/957/2002abated

The State Of Maharashtra v. Vijay Tukaram Jagtap

2019-08-22Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre2 pages

1/2 205-APP957-02&45-02.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.957 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra ..

Appellant Vs.

Vijay Tukaram Jagtap ..

Respondent (Orig. Accused) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.45 OF 2002 Vijay Tukaram Jagtap ..

Appellant (Orig. Accused) Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...

Mr. Ajay Patil, A.P.P. for the State.

Mr. Bharat Jain i/b. Mr. Ganesh Gole for the Accused.

CORAM:

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED :

22nd AUGUST, 2019.

P.C:- 1.

Accused Vijay Tukaram Jagtap has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and has been sentenced AJN

2/2 205-APP957-02&45-02.doc to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and pay fine in sum of ₹ 10,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of nine months.

2.

The state is aggrieved by the sentence imposed and seeks enhancement. The Accused has filed an appeal challenging his conviction.

3.

The Accused has died and, thus, the proceedings have abated. 4.

The appeals be consigned to the record.

(SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) AJN