Conservator Of Forests And ANR. v. Bapu Sakharam Talekar
1 / 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.6 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3274 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.707 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.6 OF 2016 Conservator of Forests & Anr.
.... Appellants versus Savala Dhondiba Pise ... Respondent LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3278 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.915 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.7 OF 2016 Conservator of Forests & Anr.
.... Appellants versus Laxman Nivrutti Pawar ... Respondent LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.8 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3365 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.909 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.8 OF 2016 Nesarikar
2 / 4 Conservator of Forest Pune Circle & Anr.
.... Appellants versus Ramchandra Laxman Shendkar ... Respondent LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.9 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3364 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.1294 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.9 OF 2016 Conservator of Forests and Anr.
.... Appellants versus Bapu Sakharam Talekar ... Respondent LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.10 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3273 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.919 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.10 OF 2016 Conservator of Forests & Anr.
.... Appellants versus Dattatray Haribhau Shinde ... Respondent .......
• Mr.P.P. More, AGP for the Appellants.
• Mr.Onkar Warange, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 06th DECEMBER, 2017.
3 / 4 P.C. :
1.
The learned AGP Mr.Prashant More states that the Appellants have submitted a proposal which is comprised in the letter dated 02/12/2014 addressed by the Sub-Divisional Forest Officer, Bhor, Pune, to the Chief Conservator of Forests (Regional) Pune. The said proposal is in respect of the regularization of the services of the Respondent in each of the above Letters Patent Appeals. The same is in consonance with the directions issued by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.96 to 101/97 and has confirmed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the above Writ Petition. The learned AGP in view of the said communication dated 02/12/2014 submits that since the proposal for regularization of the services of the Respondent in each of the above Letters Patent Appeals has been sent, the challenge in the above Letters Patent Appeals has turned infructuous.
2.
The Letters Patent Appeals are accordingly disposed of
4 / 4 as having turned infructuous. The communication dated 02/12/2014 as adverted to hereinabove, is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification.
3.
Since the communication is dated 02/12/2014, the Chief Conservator of Forest (Regional) and the State of Government is directed to consider the said proposal expeditiously and pass appropriate orders on the same latest by 28/02/2018.
4.
In view of the dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeals, the Civil Applications do not survive and to accordingly stand disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)