Jai Prakash Vaidya v. Gaurav Sunil Diwe

37. MCA 9 of 2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2021 Jai Prakash Vaidya ...Applicant vs.

Gaurav Sunil Diwe

...Respondent

***** Minal V. Chavan i/by Ms. Jai A. Vaidya - Advocate for the Applicant Mr. Bharat Ghadavi a/w Ms. Trushna Shah i/by Tejesh Dande - Advocate for the Respondent ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

05th AUGUST, 2022 P. C. :- 1.

Yesterday this matter was kept and it is submitted by both the learned Advocates, that parties have settled the dispute and executed the Consent Terms.

2.

Yesterday Respondent-Husband was present but Applicant-Wife was not present. Hence it is kept today.

3.

The Consent Terms executed by the parties is taken on record. 4.

The Mis. Civil Application is disposed of. Court has not said anything about the Consent Terms.

5.

In Yesterday's Order instead of 'Family Court ,Thane' it is referred as '

Family Court, Bandra'. It be corrected as 'Family Court Thane' . The Order dated 04/08/2022 is modified accordingly.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2022.08.06 10:59:42 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/1