← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3622/2018disposed off

Shri. Krishna Madhav Wankhede v. Kulgaon Badlapur Municipal Council Through Its Commissioner, And ORS.

2018-03-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.2 pages

Mhi WP-St-1224-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (St.) NO. 1224 OF 2018 Shri Krishna Madhav Wankhede Petitioner

Versus

Kulgaon Badlapur Municipal Council & Ors.

Respondents Mr.Ajay Patil a/w Mr. A.Y.Patil, for the Petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule,for Respondent No.1.

Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP, for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ.

DATE :13th March, 2018.

P.C. :

Heard. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, makes a statement that he would restrict the writ petition to relief claimed in prayer clause (b). Statement accepted. Prayer clause (b) reads as follows :- "b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, orders, directions or any other appropriate writ in that nature, directing the Respondent No.1 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner dated 22.11.2017 to the Respondent no.1 (Exhibit H hereto)"

Mhi WP-St-1224-18.doc 2.

In the light of above, we dispose of the petition by directing respondent No.1 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2017 (a copy of which is annexed as Exhibit "H" to the petition) as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within four weeks from today. Ordered accordingly.

3.

It is made clear that we have not gone into merits of the matter and all points and contentions of the parties are kept open.

4.

In order to enable respondent No.1 to comply with this order, the petitioner shall remain present before respondent No.1 on 2.4.2018 along with a copy of the said representation as also a copy of this order.

[SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.] [RANJIT MORE,J.]